A Mavrin Labs engagement agrees the result before anything gets built, then runs in five steps you can see and approve one at a time. The same Mavrin Labs team runs every step, so the people who measure your workflow in the first week are the people who hand it back working.
Why does more effort stall without connected systems?
More effort stalls whenever the systems underneath it cannot pass work to each other. Adding a tool, a spreadsheet or an extra pair of hands moves the bottleneck rather than removing it, because every new part needs somebody to keep it in step with the others. The hours disappear into the joins between them.
- More tools
- Each new tool holds its own copy of the same facts, and somebody keeps all the copies honest.
- More effort
- Work that depends on a person remembering fails on the week that person is away.
- More reports
- A report rebuilt by hand each month tells you what happened, far too late to change it.
The core: a result agreed before the build
One thing separates this from a quote for a piece of software: you and the team write the result down and agree it before the build starts. A baseline, a target in hours back or revenue, how it gets measured, and the date you review it together. The agreement comes first and the technology follows from that agreement.
Risk comes down here by agreeing a measurable result in advance, rather than by any promise made after the work.
The measurable results page sets out each part of that agreement, including what happens at the review and what no builder can control.
How the work runs
The work runs in five named steps: Assess, Design, Build, Launch and Support. Assess and Design produce the written scope and the agreed result, and the last three steps carry them out. Each one concludes with something you can examine and approve, so you always know which stage the work occupies and what is coming next. No step carries a promised end date until the scope exists in writing.
-
Assess, step 1
You walk the team through the workflow. It gets timed, counted and recorded as the baseline. You receive an honest reading of whether a build earns its place at all.
-
Design, step 2
You decide which steps the system takes on and which ones a person approves. With the baseline from Assess, this step produces the written scope naming what gets built and the result it should reach, which you approve before any build.
-
Build, step 3
You provide access and real examples from your own week. Mavrin Labs builds on your existing tools and shows you working parts as they land.
-
Launch, step 4
You pick when each part goes live. Your staff see what changed and how to step in, and the old way stays available until the new one holds.
-
Support, step 5
You keep using the system through the agreed period. On the review date the team measures the same work again and tells you what it found.
Who does the work?
A Mavrin Labs team of thirteen people in mixed roles does the work, and the same people stay with a project from the assessment through to the review. You explain your workflow once, to the people who will build it, and those same people are present when you read the result together.
That has a practical effect for you: no handover loses what the team understands about your systems, because no handover happens. The about page covers how the team is put together.
Where to go next
Two pages carry the detail this overview leaves out, each answering the question owners generally ask next.
Frequently asked questions
Do we have to replace our current systems to work this way?
You do not have to replace your current systems to work this way. Mavrin Labs builds on the tools you already operate and connects them, because replacing a working system spends the hours and the revenue this work exists to protect. Where a tool genuinely cannot do what a workflow needs, Mavrin Labs says so in the design step and you choose what happens.
Who will we actually be working with?
You work with the same Mavrin Labs team from the first conversation to the review. The people who assess your workflow are the ones who design it, build it, launch it and measure it afterwards, which is why nothing has to be explained twice. Nobody hands you to an account manager who has never seen the system.
How is success measured at the end of a project?
Mavrin Labs measures success against the baseline recorded in the first step, using the measure you agreed before the build. The team times the work as it runs today, you both set a target in hours back or revenue, and it repeats the same measurement on the review date. The comparison is yours to check, which is the point of agreeing it in advance.
What should we bring to a strategy session?
Bring one workflow that repeats and annoys somebody every week, along with a rough sense of how often it runs and who touches it. You do not need a specification or a shortlist of tools. The session is for working out whether the hours inside that workflow justify a build, and you will hear it plainly when the honest answer is no.
What happens at each step if priorities change mid-build?
Priorities that change mid-build wait for the end of a step rather than interrupting one. Every step closes with something you can see and approve, which is the natural moment to stop, change the order of work, or rewrite the remaining scope. The team explains what a change affects before anybody acts on it.
Last updated
Which hours would you take back first?
Send Mavrin Labs one workflow that is costing you the most time, and the reply comes back by email from the people who would build the fix.
Start a conversation